This week, we talk about how views of Nanjing have shifted since WWII, and where the modern right-wing revisionists came from. Why are we still talking about a massacre from 80 years ago?
Yoshida, Takashi. The Making of the Rape of Nanjing.
Fogel, Joshua. The Nanjing Massacre in History and Historiography.
Tadashi, Bob Wakabayashi. The Nanjing Attrocity, 1937-38: Complicating the Picture.
Images
2 thoughts on “Episode 143 – Nanjing, Part 2”
I’m enjoying your podcast very much. Just listened to the two-part coverage of Nanjing. Have you seen the film “The Flowers of War”? It’s currently streaming on Netflix. It’s set during the Nanjing attack and, while not overly graphic, is fairly unsettling. I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on it.
Keep up the good work!
listening to this episode, i felt you tried a bit too hard to convince us that revisionism is near-universally discredited in today’s Japan. After all, even if, for example, Shintaro Ishihara’s view of the Nanjing Massacre is completely unrepresentative, you can’t get away from the fact that he was literally representative of the capital city, so presumably most people regarded his attitude to the war as not important enough to stop them voting for him. Can you imagine a holocaust-denier being voted mayor of Berlin? Then of course there is the somewhat ambivalent attitude to Japanese warcrimes of the PM……
In general, my own impression is that Japan has attempted (and perhaps succeeded) in executing a piece of historical sleight-of-hand comparable to that of Austria. Both countries appear to have largely convinced themselves that they were victims, not aggressors ….Austria because it was “invaded” in 1936, Japan because of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
I’m enjoying your podcast very much. Just listened to the two-part coverage of Nanjing. Have you seen the film “The Flowers of War”? It’s currently streaming on Netflix. It’s set during the Nanjing attack and, while not overly graphic, is fairly unsettling. I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on it.
Keep up the good work!
listening to this episode, i felt you tried a bit too hard to convince us that revisionism is near-universally discredited in today’s Japan. After all, even if, for example, Shintaro Ishihara’s view of the Nanjing Massacre is completely unrepresentative, you can’t get away from the fact that he was literally representative of the capital city, so presumably most people regarded his attitude to the war as not important enough to stop them voting for him. Can you imagine a holocaust-denier being voted mayor of Berlin? Then of course there is the somewhat ambivalent attitude to Japanese warcrimes of the PM……
In general, my own impression is that Japan has attempted (and perhaps succeeded) in executing a piece of historical sleight-of-hand comparable to that of Austria. Both countries appear to have largely convinced themselves that they were victims, not aggressors ….Austria because it was “invaded” in 1936, Japan because of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.